Subject | Re: [Firebird-Java] Re: Problem with SELECT Statement |
---|---|
Author | Nickolay Samofatov |
Post date | 2003-09-19T12:25:19Z |
Hello, Roman,
cleanup may need to be inhibited, but I doubt it for retaining
transactions as they are marked as committed AFAIR. I may perform a
closer look on this code if you want.
If what I wrote is wrong then it is a bug and should be threated as
such. You can post post appropropriate item to Bug Tracker along with
testcase.
In isc_tpb_concurrentcy modes GC is needed to be inhibited because
snapshot is preserved across commit.
is important as this mode is usually useless for serious development.
Nickolay Samofatov
>> This is just an unfortunately the way the driver implements autoGC should never be inhibiteded in READ COMMITTED case. Only TIP
>> commit mode - I don't know exactly why but it was necessary (at
>> least as far as anyone could see) to do this to implement
>> auto-commit with firebird.
> Reason for this is that server supports auto-commit mode using commit
> retaining (what this is you can read in documentation and ask in
> Firebird-Support group).
> Unfortunatelly commit retaining might inhibit garbage collection
cleanup may need to be inhibited, but I doubt it for retaining
transactions as they are marked as committed AFAIR. I may perform a
closer look on this code if you want.
If what I wrote is wrong then it is a bug and should be threated as
such. You can post post appropropriate item to Bug Tracker along with
testcase.
In isc_tpb_concurrentcy modes GC is needed to be inhibited because
snapshot is preserved across commit.
> and after some point will cause an error "maximum number ofThis had to be fixed in 1.5. Have you got a testcase for this problem?
> savepoints exceeded".
> So, fetching all data to the client seemed for us the only option toAnyway, I do not think that clear implementation of auto-commit mode
> implement auto-commit mode cleanly.
is important as this mode is usually useless for serious development.
> Roman Rokytskyy--
Nickolay Samofatov