Subject | Re: compiling jaybird driver to target 1.1 JVMs |
---|---|
Author | g868avx |
Post date | 2003-06-09T17:49:53Z |
Thanks for your helpful suggestions. Unfortunately, it is a server
side app (a web app using Domino R5 - R6 has the 1.4 JVM, but my
company is stuck on R5 for the forseeable future).
I could possibly have looked at using an old version of Interclient
in the interim, but that seems to be nowhere available for a pre1.2
JVM.
Bernard
side app (a web app using Domino R5 - R6 has the 1.4 JVM, but my
company is stuck on R5 for the forseeable future).
I could possibly have looked at using an old version of Interclient
in the interim, but that seems to be nowhere available for a pre1.2
JVM.
Bernard
--- In Firebird-Java@yahoogroups.com, "Rick Fincher" <rnf@t...> wrote:
> Hi Bernard,
>
> I don't know what your app is, but if your clients are required to
run JVM
> 1.1 (as in the default MS JVM with Windows) you may want to
consider setting
> the program up as a web app.
>
> Then only the JVM on the server is needed by the app, and you can
control
> which JVM is used on the server. The clients access the app
through their
> browsers and no JVM is needed at all on the client side unless you
use
> applets.
>
> If you need to run it as an executable Java app on the client, you
can still
> use a a web app on the server and use the Java HTTP classes to
transfer the
> data to and from the server. There again, the JayBird jdbc driver
and 1.2
> or greater JVM only needs to be on the server.
>
> Rick
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > > After reading about this error, it appears that it should be
possible
> > > to compile Jaybird in the latest JDKS using a "target 1.1"
parameter.
> > >
> > > Would this be a total waste of my time (i.e. is there so much
later
> > > stuff required that it simply will not work)? If not, could
anyone
> > > point me in the direction of the necessary source code.
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > Bernard.
> >
> > I think so. Most likely it will not compile. We are using
reflection
> > in some places, dynamic proxies, etc. You should be able to build
> > org.firebirdsql.gds.* and org.firebirdsql.jgds.* classes, but not
JCA
> > and JDBC classes. So, even if byte code will be 1.1 compliant, it
will
> > not run in 1.1 JVMs.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Roman Rokytskyy