Subject | Re: Should (Could) FBStatements be held in WeakHashMap |
---|---|
Author | Roman Rokytskyy |
Post date | 2003-04-04T20:21:23Z |
Nickolay,
3.0 do not have this section. I wonder if they simply forgot to
inlude it there or specification was changed.
Thanks!
Roman
> This part of JDBC spec is very clear. Here is a snippet:Interesting, this can be found only in JDBC 1.2, JDBC 2.1 and JDBC
> ------------
> 9.2 Multi-threading
> We require that all operations on all the java.sql objects be
> multi-thread safe and able to cope correctly with having several
> threads simultaneously calling the same object.
3.0 do not have this section. I wonder if they simply forgot to
inlude it there or specification was changed.
Thanks!
Roman