Pretty much yes: you have to bind the FBWrappingDataSource into jndi using
ObjectFactory/Referenceable rather than using serialization, and configure
it to use pooling. I think there's an example of how to set this up inside
Tomcat/Catalina in the release notes.

I think basically nothing will work if you bind FBWrappingDataSource using
serialized binding. There are several similar problems we have with
serialized bindings, some easier than others, but I haven't solved any of
them yet.

david jencks

On 2002.09.20 08:54:15 -0400 Mandip S. Sangha wrote:
> Hi Roman
>
> I have a framework that uses javax.sql.DataSource objects for getting
> connections to a database. An implementation
> javax.sql.ConnectionPoolDataSource interface is also provided with the
> framework. I was looking into using this class to create and maintain a
> connection pool. Without pooling I guess I would be using the
> FBSimpleDataSource class to pass DataSource objects to the framework.
> Inorder to use the pooling I would have to create an instance
> of ConnectionPoolDataSource class, set my particular database properties
> and register it with JNDI. Then for a DataSource object to use this
> pooling facility, I would have to use the setDataSourceName() method to
> inform the DataSource object of the whereabouts of the
> ConnectionPoolDataSource object registered with JNDI. The DataSource
> object is itself registered with JNDI and whenever a lookup on the
> DataSource is performed the resulting DataSource object will retrieve
> connections from the ConnectionPoolDataSource object. Thus making the
> connection pooling transparent. However, now that you mentioned the
> FBWrappingDataSource class I think all the above discussion is probably
> irrelevant since I think this class will have the same effect. Is this
> true????
>
> Regards
> Mandip
>
>
> Roman Rokytskyy wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >
> >
> >>Can anyone tell me if there is a class somewhere in the driver that
> >>implements the DataSource interface and the setDataSourceName
> >>(String name) method????
> >>
> >>
> >
> >there are:
> >
> >org.firebirdsql.jdbc.FBSimpleDataSource - simple implementation with
> >no connection pooling
> >
> >org.firebirdsql.jdbc.FBWrappingDataSource - DataSource implementation
> >with built-in connection pooling.
> >
> >However, none of them have setDataSourceName(String) method. What it
> >is supposed to do?
> >
> >Best regards,
> >Roman Rokytskyy
> >
> >
> >
> >To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> >Firebird-Java-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> >
> >
> >
> >Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Firebird-Java-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
>