> Just a matter of curiosity: why are you using FBResultSet, not
> FBResultSetWithFields? This seems to be now the default
> implementation of type conversion routines....

Ugh!
Actually I didn't know FBResultSetWithFields was the current implementation.
I just got the new code from the CVS and checked the bug in FBResultSet,
which a month ago gave me some problems.

Thank you
Massimo