Subject | Re: [Firebird-Java] Re: serious problem with FBResultSet |
---|---|
Author | Marczisovszky Daniel |
Post date | 2002-03-27T12:30:07Z |
r> Hmmm... sounds strange to me. Caching of the Blob data is still
r> there. I will check the FBResultSet. It might be that it was lost
r> when merging the FBResultSet and FBResultSetWithFields.
Yesterday, when we're talking about differences between BLOB and
BINARY fields, you said, sometimes BLOB are used to store really big
binary data, for which you're interested in only parts of it.
Don't you think that instead of caching the blobs rather the
transaction handling should be changed?
Best wishes,
Daniel
r> there. I will check the FBResultSet. It might be that it was lost
r> when merging the FBResultSet and FBResultSetWithFields.
Yesterday, when we're talking about differences between BLOB and
BINARY fields, you said, sometimes BLOB are used to store really big
binary data, for which you're interested in only parts of it.
Don't you think that instead of caching the blobs rather the
transaction handling should be changed?
Best wishes,
Daniel