Subject | Re: Transactions issues |
---|---|
Author | Roman Rokytskyy |
Post date | 2002-12-05T23:23:09Z |
> Looks good, except I think if setAutocommit(false) is called youThat was my idea too. But since I do not remember that I have added
> should not start a new transaction until work is started. This
> would be consistent with (a), agreed?
this code, I asked about it here, maybe there is some reason for it.
Anyway, I will wait next 20 hours, and if no objections are posted, I
will commit changes into CVS.
Thanks!
Roman