I was completely wrong about this, Blas has simply moved the code
elsewhere. I don't know what the problem is.

Sorry for the false alarm

david jencks

On 2002.10.31 12:33:13 -0500 David Jencks wrote:
> Hi,
> this is more or less my fault. For a couple of days I had checked in by
> mistake some experimental code to try to identify the source of some date
> problems (the encode/decode date routines are slightly broken). Blas
> seems to have worked from this version with his performance improvements.
>
> I should be able to fix this shortly.
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
> On 2002.10.31 11:31:57 -0500 Rick Fincher wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I just updated an older program that uses a dialect 1 database with
> > yesterday's cvs code.
> >
> > The date behavior was strange. The program didn't recognize any of the
> > dates inserted as timestamps into the database by the old program, but
> > worked OK with new insertions.
> >
> > When I looked at the database with FBWorkbench (which recognizes it as
> a
> > dialect 1 database) all the old dates appeared normal but the new
> > insertions
> > had dates in 1859, even though the Java program with the new JayBird
> was
> > interpreting the dates correctly.
> >
> > The older JayBird beta driver worked fine with the old dates.
> >
> > Any ideas?
> >
> > Rick
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > Firebird-Java-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Firebird-Java-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
>