Subject Re: Timestamp fractional seconds
Author meiers_much
Thanks for your answers, but now I'm baffled.

How can it be, that iSQL delivers the full timestamp (with fractional
seconds) and the pure java solution can't do it? I thought, that they
share same communication.

Let me ask a more precice question: Can this issue be solved in java
code or not?

Thanks again

Sven

--- In Firebird-Java@y..., Helen Borrie <helebor@t...> wrote:
> At 03:36 PM 02-10-02 +0000, you wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> > > Inserting a timestamp into Firebird:
> > >
> > > '2002-10-02 13:41:12.171'
> > >
> > > yields the following results on a select ...
> > > iSQL: '2002-10-02 13:41:12.171'
> > > IBConsole's iSQL: '2002-10-02 13:41:12'
> > > Firebird-Java: '2002-10-02 13:41:12'
> > >
> > > So I assume, that firebird has the exact value but the java
driver
> > > (and IBConsole too) delivers it truncated?
> > >
> > > (same question in the following messages:
> > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Firebird-Java/message/1754
> > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Firebird-Java/message/1520
> > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Firebird-Java/message/926
> > > )
> > >
> > > Just wanted to ask if anybody has a workaround before I dig into
> > > the sources.
> >
> >This is not driver issue, but core engine. If you have this table:
> >
> >create table test_time(
> > timestamp_col timestamp
> >)
> >
> >and you execute next statement in isql
> >
> >insert into test_time values('now')
> >
> >you will see that milliseconds are not there.
> >
> >The only workaround that comes to my mind is to use NUMERIC(18,0)
> >field and store millis since 1.1.1970 (normal Java time
> >representation).
> >
> >Best regards,
> >Roman Rokytskyy
>
> Actually, a better "workaround" might be to use the
GetExactTimestamp UDF
> on the server side. This is to be found in the
> FBUDF.dll. Downside: FBUDF is currently available only for
Windows
> servers; and it works only with CURRENT_TIMESTAMP (or CAST('now'
as
> TIMESTAMP). It would be worth your while to download the source
for it, if
> you are considering a platform-independent Java-ish solution...
>
> Helen