Subject | Re: [IB-Java] New JDBC work started |
---|---|
Author | Martijn Tonies |
Post date | 2001-04-20T22:32:24Z |
Hi,
What I just wanted to say that I think the InterServer should be part of the
original install - not a seperate one. I think it's part of the whole RDBMS
package, with Java connectivity (which should belong to the basic
package these days) - alright, not to the core engine, I choose my words a
little clumsy there...
Martijn Tonies
InterBase Workbench - the developer tool for InterBase
http://www.interbaseworkbench.com
Upscene Productions
http://www.upscene.com
"This is an object-oriented system.
If we change anything, the users object."
> > Has anyone thought about combining the InterBase server and InterServerthe
> > in
> > one install? After all, InterServer is part of the database engine...
> > well,
> > sort of.
>
> NOOOO! Please don't do this!!! The whole point of a new driver is to
> eliminate the extra copying layer interserver provides, to provide a more
> sensible communication scheme (i.e. = original interbase) and to expose
> hidden parts of the interbase API that interserver cleverly covers up(more
> or less XA transaction support) (= needed for serious application serverI agree on not an extra layer :)
> work).
What I just wanted to say that I think the InterServer should be part of the
original install - not a seperate one. I think it's part of the whole RDBMS
package, with Java connectivity (which should belong to the basic
package these days) - alright, not to the core engine, I choose my words a
little clumsy there...
Martijn Tonies
InterBase Workbench - the developer tool for InterBase
http://www.interbaseworkbench.com
Upscene Productions
http://www.upscene.com
"This is an object-oriented system.
If we change anything, the users object."