Subject | Re: [IB-Java] The dialect problem (and architecture question) |
---|---|
Author | Krzysztof Golko |
Post date | 2000-08-15T15:40:53Z |
Hi,
I've managed to build InterClient 2.0, but I didn't
managed to build InterServer 2.0. Maybe because the
make file is for VC++ and doesn't work for BC5.5 or
maybe because last time I was using command line
compilers and make when I was a kid.
Kris
--- Edward Flick <eddy@...> wrote:
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail � Free email you can access from anywhere!
http://mail.yahoo.com/
I've managed to build InterClient 2.0, but I didn't
managed to build InterServer 2.0. Maybe because the
make file is for VC++ and doesn't work for BC5.5 or
maybe because last time I was using command line
compilers and make when I was a kid.
Kris
--- Edward Flick <eddy@...> wrote:
> Hi,__________________________________________________
> There is a 2.0 version in development, you can dload
> the source but I for
> one have not been able to figure out how to build
> anything.
>
> The reason for InterServer is to make the client
> smaller.
>
> Edward Flick
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Marc Palmer" <marc@...>
> To: <IB-Java@egroups.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2000 09:30
> Subject: [IB-Java] The dialect problem (and
> architecture question)
>
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I've just joined and scanned the archives quickly.
>
> First:
>
> Is there any usable JDBC driver for IB6 newer than
> InterClient 1.6?
> Specifically, I need to be able to talk to my
> DIALECT 3 IB6 database for
> the ANSI DATE and TIME types (jeez they were 8 years
> late on those
> weren't they?!)
>
> If the answer is no I'm going to be very unhappy -
> I'll have to abandon
> IB6.
>
> Second:
>
> What is the reasoning behind InterServer and it's
> proxying role? Why
> can't we have a Java driver that talks direct to
> Interbase? It's a pain
> having to run yet another server/daemon in addition
> to Interbase and all
> the others we use! (Apache, Jserv, and our own
> protocols!)
>
> Surely this introduces more of a performance
> bottleneck / extra latency
> that would not occur if the JDBC driver talked
> direct to IB6. Or is the
> solution to this to strap on a new protocol handler
> to IB6 so that we can
> use other "standard" JDBC drivers such as those used
> for Oracle and MS
> SQL? (I've forgotten the name of that "standard").
>
> Thanks
> --
> CARDIACS make wonderful music -
> http://www.cardiacs.com/button.html
>
> Marc Palmer, AnyWare Ltd. Java &
> Delphi & C++ & C
>
> http://www.anyware.co.uk All my
> opinions are just that
> http://www.fungiphotos.com - not those
> of anybody else
>
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> IB-Java-unsubscribe@egroups.com
>
>
>
>
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail � Free email you can access from anywhere!
http://mail.yahoo.com/