| Subject | Re: [Firebird-general] Create table with different ownership |
|---|---|
| Author | Dimitry Sibiryakov |
| Post date | 2015-04-18T13:03:34Z |
18.04.2015 13:50, Mark Rotteveel mark@... [Firebird-general] wrote:
If, per standard, table is not owned by user but schema, then our
RDB$RELATION.RDB$OWNER should, actually, contain name of schema that the table belongs to,
right?
--
WBR, SD.
> Not really, the fact that a schema is owned by a user, does not meanRight, but lets talk about table ownership only for now.
> that schema and user are an equivalence. There can be more than one
> schema owned by a user.
If, per standard, table is not owned by user but schema, then our
RDB$RELATION.RDB$OWNER should, actually, contain name of schema that the table belongs to,
right?
--
WBR, SD.