Subject | Re: [Firebird-general] RE: MySQL versus Firebird |
---|---|
Author | Paul Vinkenoog |
Post date | 2014-03-11T03:02:37Z |
<faulksp@...> wrote:
What exactly is your problem? Yes, the C API is ugly (like many C APIs). But it's usable, and you can write your own wrapper around it or use one of the existing connectivity toolsets.
Anyway, next time you come back here for another look, maybe you should check out the Firebird 3 Alpha 2 Release Notes, section "Application Programming Interfaces".
Cheers,
Paul Vinkenoog
> A usable C API would be a good one to add to the listCountless people - developers as well as end users - use this database engine "in a meaningful way" on a daily basis.
>
> This is the reason I don't use Firebird anymore. I keep coming back for another look every now and again, but it seems actually being able to use the database engine in a meaningful way doesn't seem to have any priority.
What exactly is your problem? Yes, the C API is ugly (like many C APIs). But it's usable, and you can write your own wrapper around it or use one of the existing connectivity toolsets.
Anyway, next time you come back here for another look, maybe you should check out the Firebird 3 Alpha 2 Release Notes, section "Application Programming Interfaces".
Cheers,
Paul Vinkenoog