Subject | Re: [Firebird-general] MySQL versus Firebird |
---|---|
Author | Saunders, Rich |
Post date | 2014-03-10T12:50:12Z |
On 2014-03-10 05:04, mariuz@...-dev.ro wrote:
perform them as best you can.
I'm curious why you say Firebird does not have support for temporary
tables (F531). Is it the specific implementation that is deficient?
--
Cheers!
Rich Saunders
Links:
------
[1] http://ocelot.ca/blog/blog/2014/03/09/354/
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> I decided to compare the current versions of MySQL 5.6 and Firebird SQL 2.5. I only looked at features that end users can see, without benchmarkingGood job! Yes, comparisons are difficult but it is still useful to
>
> http://ocelot.ca/blog/blog/2014/03/09/354/ [1]
perform them as best you can.
I'm curious why you say Firebird does not have support for temporary
tables (F531). Is it the specific implementation that is deficient?
--
Cheers!
Rich Saunders
Links:
------
[1] http://ocelot.ca/blog/blog/2014/03/09/354/
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]