Lester Caine wrote:

> I think this is a case where a 2.1.2a should have been put out to fix
> the 'regression'

The interesting fact is that it's not really a regression but a very old
bug which was just made more visible by other changes in v2.1.2.

> SO perhaps at this stage it is appropriate to run 2.1.3 a little earlier
> than was originally planned?

Exactly this has been decided recently. And it's already in the way.


Dmitry