Hi Tomneko,

did you use the default my.cnf vs. default firebird.conf.
As you probably know the differ a great deal on buffer-sizes.
If it is possible it would be interesting to see what happens
if you increase the fb-buffers accordingly.

NTFS faster than ext3... You will have a hard time to convice
me and others there... ;-).

Thank you for your posting - more detailed spec of setup would help.

//t

--- In Firebird-general@yahoogroups.com, Tsutomu Hayashi <tomneko.h@...> wrote:
>
> Hi all
>
> Sory lack of information, I use MySQL 5.1.40.
>
> I assume Firebird2.5SuperClassi always faster than others on Windows.
>
> IMHO on Linux Firebird need more disk access, then file system is more
> inportant than others.
> So, NTFS on Windows is clearly more effective than Ext3 on linux. Must
> use other fast file systems on linux with firebird.
>
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> From Tomneko (Tsutomu Hayashi)
> tomneko.h@...
> web site http://www.tomnekosoft.com
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> 2009/11/7 marius adrian popa <mapopa@...>
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 12:44 PM, marius adrian popa <mapopa@...> wrote:
> > > Tests done by  Tomneko (Tsutomu Hayashi)
> > >
> > > pptx alert
> > >
> > > http://www.firebirdnews.org/?p=3759
> > >
> > ave updated the article and added ppt and odp format to be viewed in
> > all viewers
> >
> > any comments about the benchmarks :) ?
> >
> >
>