Subject | Re: [Firebird-general] Silly SQL Server... |
---|---|
Author | Kjell Rilbe |
Post date | 2009-10-06T14:02:03Z |
Thomas Steinmaurer wrote:
record for unique constraints? Is it more common to ignore nulls
completely in unique constraint? Or is it the other way around? And
which one is more standard compliant?
Kjell
--
--------------------------------------
Kjell Rilbe
DataDIA AB
E-post: kjell@...
Telefon: 08-761 06 55
Mobil: 0733-44 24 64
> >> Kjell Rilbe wrote:Can you elaborate? I seem to recall that MSSQL allows only one NULL
> > Somehow it seems typical of a Microsoft product to do strange unexpected
> > things without telling anyone... And I though other FB enthusiasts like
> > me might find this example amusing. :-)
>
> Another amusing example is how MSSQL handles UNIQUE consraints with
> NULLable fields compared to all others. ;-))
record for unique constraints? Is it more common to ignore nulls
completely in unique constraint? Or is it the other way around? And
which one is more standard compliant?
Kjell
--
--------------------------------------
Kjell Rilbe
DataDIA AB
E-post: kjell@...
Telefon: 08-761 06 55
Mobil: 0733-44 24 64