Subject | Re: [Firebird-general] NULL Handling in SQLite Versus Other Database Engines |
---|---|
Author | marius popa |
Post date | 2008-04-01T09:46:40Z |
On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 8:03 PM, Leyne, Sean <Sean@...>
wrote:
developer flamerobin.org
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
wrote:
>i agree i was in hurry and i didn't mentioned the context
> > > > The goal <http://www.sqlite.org/nulls.html> is to make
> > SQLite handle
> > > > NULLs in a standards-compliant way. But the descriptions
> > in the SQL
> > > > standards on how to handle NULLs seem ambiguous. It is not clear
> > > > from the standards documents exactly how NULLs should be
> > handled in
> > > > all circumstances.
> > >
> > > ... and the relavence for Firebird is?
> >
> > read the second table
>
> I was refering to the message itself -- all it talks about is SQLite.
>
>
> The message body should have outlined the provided relevance/context:
>
> ("Here is an interesting link which shows a comparision of NULL handling
> for various engines, Firebird does really well...")
>--
>
> Message readers should not have to open a link in order determine what
> you are trying to point out.
>
>
> Sean
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Community email addresses:
> Post message: Firebird-general@yahoogroups.com
> Subscribe: Firebird-general-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> Unsubscribe: Firebird-general-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> List owner: Firebird-general-owner@yahoogroups.com
>
> Shortcut URL to this page:
> http://www.yahoogroups.com/community/Firebird-generalYahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
developer flamerobin.org
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]