Subject Re: [Firebird-general] Why is more hosting available for Mysql and Postgresql...
Author Ivan Prenosil
> Pavol STAREK wrote:
> I use firebird as hosting database from version 1.0.3. We use postgres on
> other servers with little more customers then fb. Postgres really do not
> need any maintaince.

But Firebird does not need any maintenance too. I made several installations
5 years ago, it was FB1beta, and it still works flawlesly (their knowledge
of FB is zero, so they would ask me in case of problems)

> You have to restart it every 2^32 transactions i
> think. But without housekeeping it can go slower or less responsive but it
> never fall down. No freezes, no crashes. Uptimes longer then 1 year are
> not rare. With hundreds of databases. Yuo have to restart only when
> upgrading.

Exactly my experience with FB. (but only with 10-20 databases per fb server)

> On other side longest uptime with firebird is 27 days. For now with
> version 2.0.3 i have freezes every 24 hours.

Which is not normal. Did you try to find out what the problem is ?
Can you send exact description to fb-devel list ? Do you use FB port
to some exotic OS other users do not use ?

Ivan