Subject | Re: MySQL vs Firebird (was: Re: [Firebird-general] Re: MySQL seeking a new positioning too) |
---|---|
Author | Martijn Tonies |
Post date | 2005-04-13T12:11:34Z |
Paul,
I hope that people will understand that MySQL is a SERIOUS competitor
and not some toy of 5 years ago.
Now if only their developers had the slightest idea about backwards
compatibility and usuability :-)
With regards,
Martijn Tonies
Database Workbench - developer tool for InterBase, Firebird, MySQL & MS SQL
Server
Upscene Productions
http://www.upscene.com
> > The reason for my list is just to point out that MySQL isn't as simpleas it
> > used to be :-) ... and development is going fast.I know, I know. All this doesn't make it easier for the Firebird project.
>
> Not surprising when you have $70m in VC funding sat in the bank...
> Maybe I should offer IBPhoenix shares for sale and see if we can generate
> sufficient funding to employ a marketing team and some more developers.
> Who would buy them though?
I hope that people will understand that MySQL is a SERIOUS competitor
and not some toy of 5 years ago.
Now if only their developers had the slightest idea about backwards
compatibility and usuability :-)
With regards,
Martijn Tonies
Database Workbench - developer tool for InterBase, Firebird, MySQL & MS SQL
Server
Upscene Productions
http://www.upscene.com