Subject | Re: Three open source databases - some benchmarks |
---|---|
Author | adrian_avila_mtz |
Post date | 2005-03-10T18:41:26Z |
The test looks weird to me, I've tested postgrest before and is a lot
slower than Firebird, recenly I made a test of inserting 10,000 to a
simple table with 3 fields, results were amazing, with FireBird 1.52
the time was about 13s. but with PG 8.0 final was 4.13 mins, yes. 13
secons vs more than 4 mins, that's why I found that test weird.
--- In Firebird-general@yahoogroups.com, "Ann W. Harrison"
<aharrison@i...> wrote:
slower than Firebird, recenly I made a test of inserting 10,000 to a
simple table with 3 fields, results were amazing, with FireBird 1.52
the time was about 13s. but with PG 8.0 final was 4.13 mins, yes. 13
secons vs more than 4 mins, that's why I found that test weird.
--- In Firebird-general@yahoogroups.com, "Ann W. Harrison"
<aharrison@i...> wrote:
> marius popa wrote:different
> > Results are with firebird 1.5.x
> >
> > http://benchw.sourceforge.net/benchw_results_open3.html
> >
> > any opinions ?
> >
> > ps: i cross-posted here because is a more general article
> >
>
> 1) My guess is that the test was created by a Postgres programmer.
>
> 2) If they had some level of concurrent update/read, you'd see
> results.
>
> 3) They've got firebird running through a TCP loopback on a dual
> processor system - results are not surprising.
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Ann