Ann W. Harrison wrote:

> marius popa wrote:
>>Results are with firebird 1.5.x
>>http://benchw.sourceforge.net/benchw_results_open3.html
>>any opinions ?
>
>
> 1) My guess is that the test was created by a Postgres programmer.

I would never have guessed ...

> 2) If they had some level of concurrent update/read, you'd see different
> results.

Maybe this isn't the best part of Postgres. Or MySQL.

> 3) They've got firebird running through a TCP loopback on a dual
> processor system - results are not surprising.

They did use Classic, so the dual processor wasn't totally lost.

All queries used NATURAL - is this typical? Or interesting.
All queries used old-style syntax. Would Fb do better with explicit joins?


--
Aage J.