> > Results are with firebird 1.5.x
> >
> > http://benchw.sourceforge.net/benchw_results_open3.html
> >
> > any opinions ?
> >
> > ps: i cross-posted here because is a more general article
> >
>
> 1) My guess is that the test was created by a Postgres programmer.
>
> 2) If they had some level of concurrent update/read, you'd see different
> results.
>
> 3) They've got firebird running through a TCP loopback on a dual
> processor system - results are not surprising.

4) What table type for MySQL? :-)

With regards,

Martijn Tonies
Database Workbench - developer tool for InterBase, Firebird, MySQL & MS SQL
Server
Upscene Productions
http://www.upscene.com