Subject | Re: History of Interbase's failure to make it to the big time. |
---|---|
Author | plinehan |
Post date | 2005-10-19T22:47:17Z |
In Firebird-general@yahoogroups.com,
Dmitri Kouzmenko <kdv@i...> wrote:
(from what I read somewhere but can't find
again) that they *_started_* to implement
MGA in 4 but didn't finish till 7?
(SQL Server Yukon)
some/all of what IB/FB have had for over
20 years.
http://www.phpbbserver.com/
phpbb/viewtopic.php?t=537&mforum=
dizwellforum
Seems pretty similar to IB/FB to me.
Paul...
Dmitri Kouzmenko <kdv@i...> wrote:
> >> - InterBase have MGA since 1985Maybe you mean Jinn (look it up!)?
> MT> v1, correct?
> Maybe, only Jinm can tell :-)
> MT> No earlier. Reading in the newsgroup, they say since v3 or v4I would like some clarification of this. I think
> MT> or it got extended MVCC since v4.
> what do you mean by v3 or v4?
(from what I read somewhere but can't find
again) that they *_started_* to implement
MGA in 4 but didn't finish till 7?
> MT> Although I thought it was around v7 ...Is it not called the redo log?
> not sure. I know that moving from v7 to v8
> extended database size up to 15-25% by
> metadata versioning and record versions
> (I know that versions stored in transacion log).
(SQL Server Yukon)
> MT> Not entirely sure -- it has _something_ like MGA.It appears that M$oft are definitely introducing
> I have carefully read some local articles, and seems that
> MS SQL 2005 versioning copied 95% of IB/FB versioning.
some/all of what IB/FB have had for over
20 years.
> MT> They have MVCC/MGA in its InnoDB storage system.Check out this
> already? I'm not sure about their transaction support,
> so versioning here does not mean so much. I'm wrong?
http://www.phpbbserver.com/
phpbb/viewtopic.php?t=537&mforum=
dizwellforum
Seems pretty similar to IB/FB to me.
Paul...
> Dmitri Kouzmenko, www.ibase.ru, (095) 953-13-34