Examples are very sparse unfortunately, but this should get you started,

http://firebird.sourceforge.net/index.php?op=devel&sub=netprovider&id=examples

also some snipets

here

http://forums.devshed.com/archive/t-65095

and here

http://forums.devshed.com/t182804/s.html

Hope this helps

Ash

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jekke Bladt" <jekke.bladt@...>
To: <Firebird-general@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 7:45 PM
Subject: RE: [Firebird-general] New implementation


> Could you, by any chance, point us at some examples?
>
> TIA
>
> --Jekke
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ashley Flynn [mailto:ashleyflynn@...]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 12:14 PM
> To: Firebird-general@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Firebird-general] New implementation
>
>
> indeed you can
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "George Smith" <gsmith@...>
> To: <Firebird-general@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 4:45 PM
> Subject: RE: [Firebird-general] New implementation
>
>
> > Can you interface to Firebird with C#.Net
> > Thanks
> > grs
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Myles Wakeham [mailto:myles@...]
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 10:39 AM
> > To: Firebird-general@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: RE: [Firebird-general] New implementation
> >
> >
> > I think that your decision on a DBMS is likely to have both Technical
> > items
> > and Business Items. I'll let the rest of the team here talk to the
> > technical differences between the products, but from a business
> > perspective
> > here's something to consider:
> >
> > Firebird vs MS SQL Server is kinda like comparing Linux to Windows.
> The
> > advantage that Firebird has is that its Open Source and ported to so
> > many
> > different operating systems. I suspect, although you didn't mention
> > this
> > directly, that you are dealing with a Windows shop. This could mean
> > that
> > the business differences between Firebird & MS SQL Server are simply,
> > price
> > and support levels.
> >
> > But if your company decided that it needed to host on Linux, or
> Solaris,
> > or
> > even Mac OSX, you would have the option with Firebird. There would be
> > no
> > option with MS SQL Server. The fact is, MS SQL Server comes with a
> > Windows
> > requirement. Firebird doesn't.
> >
> > Does this mean anything in your case? Maybe not. In our case,
> however,
> > its
> > critical. Not only are we avoiding yearly licensing charges with
> > Firebird,
> > but I have FAR more freedom to deploy the database on what box I want,
> > where
> > I want, etc. Also in the case of servers (and I don't want to start a
> > OS
> > 'Holy War' here but), I just prefer Linux. Its more manageable and
> > easier
> > to identify and fix problems. However with this said, due to the vast
> > history of Interbase and BOTH Unix and Windows, you won't lose out
> > regardless of platform with Firebird. The tools and stability are
> > comparable.
> >
> > Myles
> >
> > ===========================
> > Myles Wakeham
> > Director of Engineering
> > Tech Solutions Inc.
> > Scottsdale, Arizona USA
> > Phone (480) 451-7440
> > Web: www.techsol.org
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Jekke Bladt [mailto:jekke.bladt@...]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 8:13 AM
> > > To: Firebird-general@yahoogroups.com
> > > Subject: [Firebird-general] New implementation
> > >
> > > All--
> > >
> > > I'm currently in the position of making architectural
> > > recommendations at
> > > work. The firm I've joined is an equity options market maker.
> > > Our team's
> > > primary development arena is real-time trading systems running on
> > > Windows. New applications are written in C++, C# and VB.net with
> > > additional legacy base in VB6.
> > >
> > > Because most of the nature of the options market, many of the
> > > applications exist without persistent state. Every time they're run,
> > > it's like the first time.
> > >
> > > OTOH, there are places where persistent state would be incredibly
> > > helpful, but solutions have been architected around the need for
> state
> > > information because that's the shape of other solutions.
> > >
> > > So, I'm advocating we install a DBMS and start persisting a lot of
> our
> > > core information. It will make a lot of existing applications more
> > > useful, more stable, and more accurate. By my best estimates, our
> data
> > > needs aren't terribly rigorous. By the end of 2005, we'll be
> > > doing about
> > > 70,000 database writes and 12,000 reads a day if current development
> > > continues apace.
> > >
> > > That being said, I'm ready to advocate that we use Firebird
> > > as our DBMS
> > > with the other two most likely options being Sybase on Linux or SQL
> > > Server on Win2k. But, so far, this is based entirely on external
> > > observation and research. I haven't used Interbase in about ten
> years.
> > > My DBMS experience since then is with SQL Server, Sybase, and
> > > Oracle. I
> > > am most proficient in SQL Server.
> > >
> > > My second option, after Firebird, is SQL Server. If I'm going to
> sell
> > > Firebird to the team, I need to compare the two products. Firebird
> > > already has the upper hand on price point, but it's going to take
> more
> > > than that.
> > >
> > > So, I have a couple of questions:
> > >
> > > If you were presenting Firefox as an alternative to SQL Server, what
> > > would your selling points be? We've already talked the
> > > benefits of open
> > > source vs. commercial products to death without a conclusion,
> > > so that's
> > > not going to sell it.
> > >
> > > What features of SQL Server am I going to miss if we use Firebird?
> Is
> > > there support for complex data types? Extended stored
> > > procedures? Native
> > > XML support?
> > >
> > > Any guidance y'all could provide would be deeply appreciated.
> > >
> > > --Jekke
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Community email addresses:
> > > Post message: Firebird-general@yahoogroups.com
> > > Subscribe: Firebird-general-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > > Unsubscribe: Firebird-general-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > > List owner: Firebird-general-owner@yahoogroups.com
> > >
> > > Shortcut URL to this page:
> > > http://www.yahoogroups.com/community/Firebird-general
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > Community email addresses:
> > Post message: Firebird-general@yahoogroups.com
> > Subscribe: Firebird-general-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > Unsubscribe: Firebird-general-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > List owner: Firebird-general-owner@yahoogroups.com
> >
> > Shortcut URL to this page:
> > http://www.yahoogroups.com/community/Firebird-general
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Community email addresses:
> > Post message: Firebird-general@yahoogroups.com
> > Subscribe: Firebird-general-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > Unsubscribe: Firebird-general-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > List owner: Firebird-general-owner@yahoogroups.com
> >
> > Shortcut URL to this page:
> > http://www.yahoogroups.com/community/Firebird-general
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> Community email addresses:
> Post message: Firebird-general@yahoogroups.com
> Subscribe: Firebird-general-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> Unsubscribe: Firebird-general-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> List owner: Firebird-general-owner@yahoogroups.com
>
> Shortcut URL to this page:
> http://www.yahoogroups.com/community/Firebird-general
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Community email addresses:
> Post message: Firebird-general@yahoogroups.com
> Subscribe: Firebird-general-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> Unsubscribe: Firebird-general-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> List owner: Firebird-general-owner@yahoogroups.com
>
> Shortcut URL to this page:
> http://www.yahoogroups.com/community/Firebird-general
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>