Subject | Re: [Firebird-general] SQL2003 |
---|---|
Author | Blas Rodriguez Somoza |
Post date | 2004-05-10T09:51:24Z |
At 10/05/2004 11:03, you wrote:
schema etc) and FB doesn't.
Blas Rodriguez Somoza
>Lester Caine wrote:To implement SQL92 Entry level the database must support schemas (create
> > In my further work on my MySQL conversion paper ...
>
>Something to add on the paper :)
>
>example:
>Firebird has already (and now!)
>Procedures, Views , Triggers ...
>
>http://dev.mysql.com/tech-resources/quickpolls/?pollname=2004feature
> >
> > Anybody looking at the SQL2003 standard in conjunction with Firebird?
> >
> > I see it's also known as SQL200n which I presume means that they are not
> > sure WHEN it will be released?
> >
> > This is more looking at the 'portable code' question rather than MySQL,
> > but if I can start pulling things together ...
>
>I think we could do a list with sql200n features and compare that with
>firebird roadmap (a kind of to do list)
>
>A more practical compare list could be done with sql 1999
>example:
>"Firebird has full SQL 92 Entry Level 1 Support and implements most of
>the SQL-99 standard, plus some very useful additions."
schema etc) and FB doesn't.
>We should have a list with sql99 and firebird implementationRegards
Blas Rodriguez Somoza