Subject | Re: [Firebird-general] FireBird Vs MySQL |
---|---|
Author | David Garamond |
Post date | 2003-06-23T17:48:25Z |
Wilfried Atgé wrote:
bindings. both are already:
* solid & stable (i've found in my experience that mysqld is even more
stable than apache, despite being a multithreaded app; so hats off to
mysql team for that);
* easy to administer/tune;
* available natively on linux and windows;
* free ;-)
* comes with a great community to help you if you have problems;
* ACID-compliant (use bdb & innodb in mysql);
* multigenerational (innodb in mysql);
etc.
--
dave
> we are about too choose a database and we are hesitating betweenusually the important differing factors are 1) features; and 2) language
> MySQL and FireBird...
bindings. both are already:
* solid & stable (i've found in my experience that mysqld is even more
stable than apache, despite being a multithreaded app; so hats off to
mysql team for that);
* easy to administer/tune;
* available natively on linux and windows;
* free ;-)
* comes with a great community to help you if you have problems;
* ACID-compliant (use bdb & innodb in mysql);
* multigenerational (innodb in mysql);
etc.
--
dave