Subject | Re: Mozilla project use of Firebird name |
---|---|
Author | brendaneich |
Post date | 2003-04-18T20:08:22Z |
--- In Firebird-general@yahoogroups.com, Lester Caine <lester@l...> wrote:
http://www.mozilla.org and http://www.mozillazine.org and notice the
"Who we are" links, and so on? These are two different sites run by
different groups. What's more, anyone signed up at mozillazine can
post to the mozillazine forums. If some such poster put a [TM] after
Firebird to get your goat, it means nothing.
Should I judge the firebirdsql.org by the worst behavior seen on the
firebird-general list? Of course not. Please do likewise with
mozilla.org and mozillazine.org.
/be
> > HB> http://www.mozillazine.org/forums/index.php?c=4for BRANDING
> > HB> which quite clearly demonstrates that you are using our mark
> > HB> your product.Instead of relying on feelings, why don't you read
> >
> > using codenames in forum names is common practice, and does not
> > suggest that the codename is going to be used as a brand name.
> > Actually, there have been signs of the contrary (ie the Firebird name
> > will disappear from the final product brand name).
>
> Then why does Firebird[TM] get used rather than just Firebird?
>
> I do get a feeling that mozilla.org were not in control of
> the offshot project. The main site has not even a commented
> on the change yet.
http://www.mozilla.org and http://www.mozillazine.org and notice the
"Who we are" links, and so on? These are two different sites run by
different groups. What's more, anyone signed up at mozillazine can
post to the mozillazine forums. If some such poster put a [TM] after
Firebird to get your goat, it means nothing.
Should I judge the firebirdsql.org by the worst behavior seen on the
firebird-general list? Of course not. Please do likewise with
mozilla.org and mozillazine.org.
/be