Subject | Re: [IBDI] Re: New Name for IBConsole fork... |
---|---|
Author | Marcos Vinicius |
Post date | 2002-04-15T11:56:04Z |
IMHO, I think that we must have an new IBConsole version, using direct
api calls, running in both Windows and Linux. The use of components,
like IBO and IBX make a strong dependency and I don't like this. And,
using API directly will make an faster code, or I'm wrong?
Dufloth.
api calls, running in both Windows and Linux. The use of components,
like IBO and IBX make a strong dependency and I don't like this. And,
using API directly will make an faster code, or I'm wrong?
Dufloth.
>
>Those in the current IBX camp have an IBX compatible
>replacement for IBConsole, so rather than re-inventing the
>wheel, that is probably their best CURRENT option, since
>Marathon is still fairly heavily IBO linked, and will
>probably remain so. If IBAccess is to maintain compatibility
>with Firebird, then someone is going to have to maintain
>that compatibility in IBX - independent of any discussion on
>IBConsole?
>
>