Subject | Re: [IBDI] Re: Read_commited |
---|---|
Author | Ann W. Harrison |
Post date | 2001-06-08T14:46:19Z |
At 06:56 PM 6/7/2001 -0400, David Jencks wrote:
For what little it's worth, the fact that Firebird doesn't hold
read locks makes holding transactions open much less of a problem for
it than for many databases. Holding transactions open does inhibit
garbage collection - that's a problem for some applications but not
for others. Applications that primarily insert and select are less
affected than applications that primarily update and delete.
Regards,
Ann
www.ibphoenix.com
We have answers.
>My mistake, I did not make my assumption of a large number of users clear.David,
>It is also quite possible that this is much less of a problem with firebird
>than other databases.
For what little it's worth, the fact that Firebird doesn't hold
read locks makes holding transactions open much less of a problem for
it than for many databases. Holding transactions open does inhibit
garbage collection - that's a problem for some applications but not
for others. Applications that primarily insert and select are less
affected than applications that primarily update and delete.
Regards,
Ann
www.ibphoenix.com
We have answers.