Subject | Re: [IBDI] Re: Product name |
---|---|
Author | Paul Reeves |
Post date | 2001-04-27T13:45:50Z |
This is getting ridiculous.
These types of polls are inherently invalid. We can't prove if the ballot has
been stuffed. We cannot say that a reasonable cross-section of the community has
voted. Therefore we cannot take the result seriously.
I'm spoiling my ballot paper.
Paul
Pavel Císaø wrote:
Paul Reeves
http://www.ibphoenix.com
taking InterBase further
These types of polls are inherently invalid. We can't prove if the ballot has
been stuffed. We cannot say that a reasonable cross-section of the community has
voted. Therefore we cannot take the result seriously.
I'm spoiling my ballot paper.
Paul
Pavel Císaø wrote:
>--
> All,
>
> On 27 Apr 2001, at 12:41, markus.soell@... wrote:
>
> > However I now raised a different, much more precise question: Which
> > is better, Firebird or FirebirdSQL, given the arguments pro... and
> > contra... ?
> >
> > How about a new poll about this question?
>
> I'll set up a poll with choices
>
> 1) Firebird
> 2) FirebirdSQL
>
> *IF* I would get at least 3 voices to do so over nay sayers, because
> I'm not completely convinced that's necessary to make that poll (I
> guess that those who would prefer FirebirdSQL doesn't voted for
> Firebird at current poll, and Firebird was approved by 63.11%. Yes,
> except Markus :)
>
> You can send your opinion about new poll till sunday to my
> address (pcisar@...)
>
> Best regards
> -- Pavel
>
> Community email addresses:
> Post message: IBDI@yahoogroups.com
> Subscribe: IBDI-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> Unsubscribe: IBDI-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> List owner: IBDI-owner@yahoogroups.com
>
> Shortcut URL to this page:
> http://www.yahoogroups.com/community/IBDI
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Paul Reeves
http://www.ibphoenix.com
taking InterBase further