Subject | Re: CVS |
---|---|
Author | Vince Duggan |
Post date | 2000-01-21T08:18:17Z |
Hi all,
Let's assume for the moment, that NewCo does it right, and there is no
reason to assume they won't.
They will therefore have a system such as CVS, and everybody in the
community who is involved will have access to this. Therefore there is
no reason for the community to duplicate the work.
What we should be doing with this discussion, is putting pressure on
NewCo to choose the system we select as the most appropriate. We should
_not_ be assuming that NewCo will do their own (incorrect)thing, and the
community will be doing our own (correct) thing.
If NewCo does it wrong, however....
Vince
MIKE EDEN wrote:
Vince Duggan
Synectics Software
Inprise C/S Business Partner
South Africa
http://www.synectics.co.za
mailto:vince@...
Let's assume for the moment, that NewCo does it right, and there is no
reason to assume they won't.
They will therefore have a system such as CVS, and everybody in the
community who is involved will have access to this. Therefore there is
no reason for the community to duplicate the work.
What we should be doing with this discussion, is putting pressure on
NewCo to choose the system we select as the most appropriate. We should
_not_ be assuming that NewCo will do their own (incorrect)thing, and the
community will be doing our own (correct) thing.
If NewCo does it wrong, however....
Vince
MIKE EDEN wrote:
> [SNIP]--
> [It] is not clear to me how the IB
> community source control efforts will interact with whatever Newco does. If
> they use something different, than someone may be constantly having to merge
> Newco's changes into the Community's repository - and that could be painful.
> A tool will probably need to be developed to automate this.
>
> Mike
>
> Michael Eden
Vince Duggan
Synectics Software
Inprise C/S Business Partner
South Africa
http://www.synectics.co.za
mailto:vince@...