My personal bias is to keep InterBase as standards compliant as possible
unless there is some way cool thing that couldn't be done without QLI.
Frankly, I'm not do not know what QLI capabilities are. Perhaps Ann could
enlighten us poor souls.

rob

----- Original Message -----
From: Fabricio Araujo <fabricioa@...>
To: <ibdI@onelist.com>
Sent: Saturday, January 15, 2000 10:33 PM
Subject: [IBDI] QLI and ancient IB language


> From: "Fabricio Araujo" <fabricioa@...>
>
> Hi,
>
> When IB lied in Inprise's hand, it stopped support to
> the ancient language which QLI is based.
> Since (I guess) this utility still have some unleashed habilities, what
> will be the directive: transport its capacities to SQL language (which,
> in that case, will be host for non-standard SQL extensions) or leave it
> untouched or the third option (abandon it rip it out from all versions of
> Interbase)?
>
> []s Fabricio
>
>
>
> --------------------------- ONElist Sponsor ----------------------------
>
> ChickClick.com - girl sites that don't fake it! Free email with Sass.
> Tons of hip, free stuff too.
> <a href=" http://clickme.onelist.com/ad/ChickClick ">Click Here</a>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Community email addresses:
> Post message: IBDI@onelist.com
> Subscribe: IBDI-subscribe@onelist.com
> Unsubscribe: IBDI-unsubscribe@onelist.com
> List owner: IBDI-owner@onelist.com
>
> Shortcut URL to this page:
> http://www.onelist.com/community/IBDI
>