Subject | Re: [Firebird-Architect] RE: Firebird beeing inconsistent in regards to accepting UDFs? |
---|---|
Author | Jiri Cincura |
Post date | 2014-02-16T08:31:09Z |
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Dimitry Sibiryakov <sd@...> wrote:
directly under Firebird's control. But UDF is not. You can change it
freely without Firebird noticing. That's not possible for i.e. table
(OK, you can do it manually editing the file but it's order of
magnitude harder).
--
Jiri {x2} Cincura (x2develop.com founder)
http://blog.cincura.net/ | http://www.ID3renamer.com
> How about exception that will not allow you to use non-existing table? Sequence?I think the main difference is, that the table/sequence/... is
> Function? Would you like to have them "fixed" as well?..
directly under Firebird's control. But UDF is not. You can change it
freely without Firebird noticing. That's not possible for i.e. table
(OK, you can do it manually editing the file but it's order of
magnitude harder).
--
Jiri {x2} Cincura (x2develop.com founder)
http://blog.cincura.net/ | http://www.ID3renamer.com