Subject | Re: [Firebird-Architect] RE: Firebird beeing inconsistent in regards to accepting UDFs? |
---|---|
Author | Dimitry Sibiryakov |
Post date | 2014-02-15T10:29:35Z |
15.02.2014 11:11, brucedickinson@... wrote:
Function? Would you like to have them "fixed" as well?..
--
WBR, SD.
> IMHO what should be fixed is the exception that will not allow me to create a storedHow about exception that will not allow you to use non-existing table? Sequence?
> procedure containing UDF without a file.
Function? Would you like to have them "fixed" as well?..
> Besides, I can easly overcome this exception by embeeding EXECUTE BLOCK in storedIf you want DBMS without metadata consistency control, you should use MS SQL or Oracle.
> procedure that will call UDF. You would have to also block this possibility otherwise it
> would be still inconsistent behaviour.
--
WBR, SD.