Subject Re: [Firebird-Architect] RE: Firebird beeing inconsistent in regards to accepting UDFs?
Author Dimitry Sibiryakov
15.02.2014 11:11, brucedickinson@... wrote:
> IMHO what should be fixed is the exception that will not allow me to create a stored
> procedure containing UDF without a file.

How about exception that will not allow you to use non-existing table? Sequence?
Function? Would you like to have them "fixed" as well?..

> Besides, I can easly overcome this exception by embeeding EXECUTE BLOCK in stored
> procedure that will call UDF. You would have to also block this possibility otherwise it
> would be still inconsistent behaviour.

If you want DBMS without metadata consistency control, you should use MS SQL or Oracle.