Subject | Re: [Firebird-Architect] Fyracle status |
---|---|
Author | Dalton Calford |
Post date | 2010-09-08T10:32:42Z |
Are you suggesting a 'dialect oracle' ? How about a 'dialect mssql'?
The big question is, should the parser be a plugin including some system
views that support various databases including their information schema?
That would be powerful and allow firebird to be a drop in replacement of
many database backends.
The big question is, should the parser be a plugin including some system
views that support various databases including their information schema?
That would be powerful and allow firebird to be a drop in replacement of
many database backends.
On 8 September 2010 05:44, marius adrian popa <mapopa@...> wrote:
>
>
> what happened to fyracle mode ?
>
> http://www.firebirdnews.org/docs/papers/fyracle_wsw.pdf
>
> i see some of it's components/features would be integrated in 3.0 (see
> the roadmap screeshot)
> it would be nice to have an oracle "mode" for migrations from oracle
>
> also it would be nicer to have full pl/sql support too
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]