Roman Rokytskyy wrote:

>> Would you care to clarify that? I'd really like to know why longer
>> names cannot be done well.
>
> Maybe because you would need to extend the XSQLVAR structure to include
> schema name variable. Which is not backwards compatible.
>

One could maintain the existing DSQL interface for applications that
don't use schemas or long names and design a more flexible and forward
looking version for V3. Or even just add a new version of the XSQLVAR.

Best regards,

Ann