On 27/04/2010 10:42, Dalton Calford wrote:

> Other than Jim's suggestions, I have not seen any response in regards to
> this.
>
> Did I miss the email or is there no one working on the extending of the
> database object name length?
>
> Are schema's not going to be considered for version 3?
>
> I am curious if anyone is looking at the implementation of these features?
>

Well, of course you know these features should be visible in the API,
and due to how it was designed, no mater how that is done it will not be
very good.

I suggested something about it, but IMO this mater is still waiting a
good suggestion.

AFAIK, Claudio is/was working on schemas or on it internal support.


Adriano