Yes, that is my idea.



"Olivier Mascia" <om@...> schrieb:

>Roman,
>
>> I was thinking rather in the direction of statically linking Firebird
>
>> database engine (not server) in something bigger, and that bigger
>> provides its own means for remote protocol (if any), encrypted
>storage,
>> key management, tampering detection, etc.
>
>I like it that way. Which means having hooks such that an application
>linking the embedded version (would it need to be statically linked in
>for that matter, not sure) can instruct the fb core to callback the app
>host for pio (to make it short and simple).
>
>In other words: do not design for security plugins to fb, but design fb
>to be a db plugin to an application shell implementing the security.
>Is that precisely your mind?
>
>Sounds really interesting to me to reverse the point of view in such
>way.
>
>--
>Olivier
>
>
>------------------------------------
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>

--
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet.