On 10/15/10 19:09, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:

> 15.10.2010 16:59, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
>> What we started to discuss is 'Is the fact that isc_dsql_execute()
>> agrees to work with EXECUTE PROCEDURE a bug or documented behavior?'
> And everybody except Jim agreed that this is a bug.

Documented bug becomes feature :-)

> Jim insists that this was original design. If Jim is right, first fetch from EXECUTE
> PROCEDURE must return data and subsequent ones - 100.

I think that the fact that it does not return 100 is a bug.

> However, in this case one question left: what if the procedure is selectable (i.e. uses
> SUSPEND)? Shouldn't in this case all records be fetched before end-of-data and EXECUTE
> PROCEDURE to be effectively the same as SELECT?

No.