On Saturday 26 September 2009 01:04:42 Roman Rokytskyy wrote:

> > Now, who sees schemas as an urgent need and why?
>
> I do. Regardless of what rest features of the above are implemented, the
> two-level namespaces for database objects is of high priority, at leat
> in Java. Too many tools on the market simply rely on schemas being there
> and Firebird is thus not supported (they very often generate "foo"."bar"
> names to access the objects). One of the most prominent examples is
> Eclipse - we still do not have normal support for Firebird there.

Roman, fully agreed with your argument. It should be taken into serious
account when chhosing features set for FB3.

Alex.