Hello Dimitry,

>> Yet, this hasn't stopped the development and adoption of Object Pascal...
>
> Huh! And you know how this "Object Pascal" is done. As an usual
> Procedural Pascal with one invisible parameter "self" in each procedure.
> I don't see big advantage of "Object.Method(0);" in front of
> "Method(Object, 0);".

Ah yes, that's the only thing Object Pascal is good for, I forgot.

>> In short: even though you can develop what you want using procedural
>> Pascal, does that mean Object Pascal shouldn't have been developed?
>
> Unfortunately, I can't avoid using schemas in DBMS with it's support.
>
>> Just because you can think of terrible examples with Schemas, does that
>> mean Schemas cannot be put to good use?
>
> Name three. But don't mention developers without imagination who
> can't create unique names for tables, please.

If this is all you can come up with as a comment, then why should I bother?


With regards,

Martijn Tonies
Upscene Productions
http://www.upscene.com

Download Database Workbench for Oracle, MS SQL Server, Sybase SQL
Anywhere, MySQL, InterBase, NexusDB and Firebird!

Database questions? Check the forum:
http://www.databasedevelopmentforum.com