Subject Re: [Firebird-Architect] Schemas
Author Dimitry Sibiryakov
> Yet, this hasn't stopped the development and adoption of Object Pascal...

Huh! And you know how this "Object Pascal" is done. As an usual
Procedural Pascal with one invisible parameter "self" in each procedure.
I don't see big advantage of "Object.Method(0);" in front of
"Method(Object, 0);".

> In short: even though you can develop what you want using procedural
> Pascal, does that mean Object Pascal shouldn't have been developed?

Unfortunately, I can't avoid using schemas in DBMS with it's support.

> Just because you can think of terrible examples with Schemas, does that
> mean Schemas cannot be put to good use?

Name three. But don't mention developers without imagination who
can't create unique names for tables, please.