|Subject||Re: [Firebird-Architect] Schemas|
> Yet, this hasn't stopped the development and adoption of Object Pascal...Huh! And you know how this "Object Pascal" is done. As an usual
Procedural Pascal with one invisible parameter "self" in each procedure.
I don't see big advantage of "Object.Method(0);" in front of
> In short: even though you can develop what you want using proceduralUnfortunately, I can't avoid using schemas in DBMS with it's support.
> Pascal, does that mean Object Pascal shouldn't have been developed?
> Just because you can think of terrible examples with Schemas, does thatName three. But don't mention developers without imagination who
> mean Schemas cannot be put to good use?
can't create unique names for tables, please.