Subject Re: [Firebird-Architect] Question about limits in fb 2.5 or 3.0
Author Jim Starkey
Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
> Jim Starkey wrote:
>
>> Rather than increasing the page size, has Firebird considered truncated
>> index keys, where only the first hundred bytes (or whatever) are used in
>> the key? The two phase index retrieval handles these almost for free.
>>
>
> Yep, it's already in the tracker and seems quite easy to offer. However,
> I foresee some problems for compound indices.
>
>
>

What problem? They're implemented in Falcon and it was straightforward.