paulruizendaal wrote:

> Although Jim has a point in that we are seeking solutions that scale
> beyond a single machine, no matter how fast a single machine, a disk
> with 0.1 ms write latency would keep up with a few thousand updates
> per second, using traditional db approaches. Enough for most current
> use cases, I think.
>

Moving the bottleneck is often disappointing. There's usually another
one lurking behind it.

--
Jim Starkey
President, NimbusDB, Inc.
978 526-1376