> It will not work without changes in remote protocol and API. Remember USHORT's
> used for statement text length and BLR length ?

Well - I think 3.0 would be a good candidate for such change.

> Ability to manage individual items in package is good thing and worth implementing,
> i believe.

Not sure... What do we win here? Basically, I would say that the
decision to support it or not should be rather pragmatic - will the code
be clearly complexer compared to a "package-as-a-whole" solution or not...

Roman