Alex Peshkov :

> On Tuesday 24 June 2008 21:11, sergey.mereutsa wrote:
>> Agree, if entrie server is written in C/C++, why you must use non-
>> native for C indexes? Personally, I prefer zero for first array
>> element.
>
> I also prefer 0. But this is _SQL_ server, and we should better follow SQL
> traditions here. In SQL all enumeration is done based 1.

This is not SQL-language interface. This is C++ interface. Any plugin\external
engine will implement its own user-friendly wrapper on the top of this interface
to use with target programming environment. And in this wrapper they may use any
number for low index bound.

I don't know on which SQL traditions you reffers above. Am i SQL newby ? :) Why
should we ugly our own interface because of some suspicious traditions ??? I
guess our own traditions must be closer for us (remember XSQLDA ? ;)

Regards,
Vlad