unordained wrote:

> The discussion so far has been focused on your physical (scaling, lag) goals, but you also seem
> interested in some logical (model, datatype, interface) improvements over existing RDBMS's. Is that
> something you're also interested in discussing here, or would you (or other list members!) rather
> avoid turning this into a feature-request-fest? If you're going to start from scratch anyway ...
>

OK, guys, before we jump deeply into features, let's do problems. What
other nasty problems should the re-invention of the relational database
take on?

--
James A. Starkey
President, NimbusDB, Inc.
978 526-1376