On Jan 31, 2008 9:58 AM, Alex Peshkov <peshkoff@...> wrote:

> On Thursday 31 January 2008 01:40, gerryw@... wrote:
> > >Really what you are talking about is building yet another another
> > >abstraction layer. If it were me, I would simply find one of the
> > >existing abstraction layers and use it rather than trying to
> > >re-engineer the existing API.
> >
> > No. This is precisely NOT what I'm talking about. I'm suggesting the
> > addition of
> > some higher level convenience functions to the existing API. This would
> > be along the same lines as isc_expand_dpb(). If done properly, this
> would
> > have no impact on the existing interface nor compromise backward
> > compatibility.
>
> Can you provide a list of functions you suggest?

You can check an dbi c layer that could in theory be used easier than direct
c api
http://www.firebirdnews.org/?p=1483

http://libdbi.sourceforge.net/
http://libdbi-drivers.sourceforge.net/

or another way would be to use ibpp.org

>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>

--
developer flamerobin.org


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]