Subject | RE: [Firebird-Architect] Re: Window functions SQL-2003 |
---|---|
Author | Leyne, Sean |
Post date | 2007-06-19T22:56:24Z |
Alexandre,
Functions" define a separate syntax.
I suspect that the current functionality for the Common Table
Expressions, could be used as the basis for the functions which have
been requested.
Sean
> -----Original Message-----aggregations
> From: Firebird-Architect@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Firebird-
> Architect@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Alexandre Benson Smith
> Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2007 5:19 PM
> To: Firebird-Architect@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Firebird-Architect] Re: Window functions SQL-2003
>
> amoradell wrote:
> > When you see for the first time these queries, you say :
> > euh...c'est quoi ca !
> >
> > Window functions are really useful when you make complex
> > for reports and olap.I was thinking the same thing, but they are different. The "Window
> >
> > Alexandre
> >
>
> This is not what the new "Table expressions" are for ?
Functions" define a separate syntax.
I suspect that the current functionality for the Common Table
Expressions, could be used as the basis for the functions which have
been requested.
Sean